I had a thought - my initial interest in RFID was the misuse and surveillance aspect of personal and biometric data being accessible via a unique RFID signature. This was inspired by the Mexican border police and rfid tagged dignitaries who wanted to be ‘trackable’ to prevent kidnapping (even though this technology has no GPS capability), cashless transactions and our online persona/information recalled via RFID. This inherent monitoring of such interactions was apparent and that was my initial concern - however my digression into the development of Spimes, IPSO and IPv6 has taken that thought onto a bit of a tangent.
If we were to volunteer folksonomic information online about our possessions and objects then not only would that allow external control of sensor enabled objects but also it would add more detail to the digital record of our existence. If every transaction, movement (via CCTV) and communication is open to monitoring - by detailing our connection with the world around us we are adding flesh to those ‘digital bones’ already sat in some database somewhere. So by exploring the concept of blurring the lines between online and real world existence - I am still raising the question regarding surveillance and in fact making it more personal - rather than big brother watching you via CCTV, your toaster and fridge are broadcasting information about you into the ethers. Your IP enabled shoes are telling the world every step you take - and Big Brother is listening.
I also want to investigate the relationship we have with objects and ephemera - which is a direct relationship wth our consumerist existence - and highlights the task of tagging and rendering each item a smart or IP enabled object we become aware of the scale of our own consumption and hoarding of paraphenalia. As Bruce Sterling envisioned the Spime as a step towards transparent manufacture - with objects ‘fabbed’ on demand and processes of manufacture wholly apparent rather than discreet and secret. The tagging of current everyday objects creates ‘transparent consumption’ which makes our consumerist traits obvious to the internet enabled world and above all ourselves.
Would this knowledge change our habits? If we tagged and archived every item we owned and bought we would see our level of waste and consumption. Sterling states that there is no ‘away’ left to throw things and we need to radically rethink our current model of living to create a sustainable future - perhaps the Internet of Things would cause us to question what we hold onto - why we no longer use objects and perhaps by making all our possessions archived - we could facilitate the distribution of items to those without rather than simply sending them to landfill? Like a global freecycle movement.
Just a thought.